The Rights of prisoners: the basic ACLU guide to prisoners' by David Rudovsky, Alvin J. Bronstein, Edward I. Koren

By David Rudovsky, Alvin J. Bronstein, Edward I. Koren

Whereas criminal officers proceed to carry huge, immense strength over prisoners, because the past due Nineteen Sixties judicial judgements have all started to mirror an try and do away with significant legal abuses.Topics coated comprise freedom from merciless and strange punishment, due approach, legal censorship, spiritual and racial discrimination, specified matters of girls prisoners, therapy, rehabilitation, parole, and treatments and methods for hard stipulations of confinement.

Show description

Read or Download The Rights of prisoners: the basic ACLU guide to prisoners' rights PDF

Best civil rights books

Free Speech on Trial: Communication Perspectives on Landmark Supreme Court Decisions

Describes landmark loose speech judgements of the ideal court docket whereas highlighting the problems of language, rhetoric, and verbal exchange that underlie them. on the intersection of communique and primary modification legislation live major questions: what's the speech we should guard, and why may still we safeguard it?

Meaning in Law: A Theory of Speech

Regardless of frequent admiration for the 1st Amendment's safety of speech, this iconic function of yank felony proposal hasn't ever been safely theorized. latest theories of speech continue at the foundation of criminal doctrine and judicial decisionmaking, social and political philosophy, or felony and highbrow background.

Empowerment and Disempowerment of the European Citizen

This assortment engages with a significant subject matter on ecu citizenship - the emancipation of definite voters, the alienation of others - and expands the horizons to interrogate even if comparable debates and developments might be pointed out in different fields of eu integration. the focal point of the e-book is exceptionally citizen-focused.

Media and Social Justice

This ebook is an anthology of labor by way of serious media students, media makers, and activists who're dedicated to advancing social justice. themes addressed contain yet are usually not constrained to overseas media activist tasks similar to the best to verbal exchange move and its corollaries; the significance of listening and enacting guidelines that enhance democratic media; neighborhood and native media justice tasks; explorations of the demanding situations the period of participatory media pose to public media; formative years and minority media initiatives and activism; moral dilemmas posed by way of makes an attempt to democratize entry to media instruments; the ongoing marginalization of feminist views in overseas coverage venues; software program freedom and highbrow estate rights; video activism in either historic and modern contexts; net suggestions for protecting dissenting voices; and 5 debts via renowned scholar/activists in their lifelong struggles for media justice.

Extra resources for The Rights of prisoners: the basic ACLU guide to prisoners' rights

Sample text

Y. 1981), and Ramos v. Lamm, 520 F. Supp. 1059 (D. Colo. 2d 559 (10th Cir. 1980). 9. Pugh v. Locke, 406 F. Supp. D. Ala. 1976), aff'd and remanded sub nom. Newman v. 2d 283 (5th Cir. 1977), rev'd in part on other grounds sub nom. Alabama v. S. 781, 98 S. Ct. 3057, 56 L. Ed. 2d 1114 (1978). 10. Hancock v. Avery, 301 F. Supp. D. Tenn. 1969). 11. Holt v. Sarver, 309 F. Supp. D. Ark. 1970). 12. Wright v. 2d 519 (2d Cir. 1967). 13. Id. at 526. See also LaReau v. 2d 974 (2d Cir. 1972); Finney v. Arkansas Bd.

10. Hancock v. Avery, 301 F. Supp. D. Tenn. 1969). 11. Holt v. Sarver, 309 F. Supp. D. Ark. 1970). 12. Wright v. 2d 519 (2d Cir. 1967). 13. Id. at 526. See also LaReau v. 2d 974 (2d Cir. 1972); Finney v. Arkansas Bd. 2d 194 (8th Cir. 1974); Berch v. Stahl, 373 F. Supp. C. 1974). 14. Novak v. 2d 661 (5th Cir. 1971). See also Gregory v. 2d 378 (10th Cir. 1975) and Benfield v. Bounds, 363 F. Supp. C. 1973). 15. Adams v. Carlson, 368 F. Supp. D. Ill. 1973). See also Hardwick v. Ault, 447 F. Supp. D.

The discussion of substantive rights that follows in the next several chapters applies fairly generally to all prisoners in the United States, but while some of these rights are now secure for all prisoners, many others are provided only in some states or federal circuits and not in others. Wherever possible, the breakdown among different jurisdictions is indicated. Are there many court decisions in the area of prisoners' rights? Until the late 1960s, there had been practically no court decisions dealing with the rights of prisoners.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.74 of 5 – based on 26 votes