By David Lampo
It really is an axiom of contemporary American politics that many Republicans and so much conservatives should not purely anti-gay yet that they've capitulated to an anti-gay schedule formulated and pursued via the non secular correct for the earlier numerous a long time. In A primary Freedom, David Lampo makes the case that aid for homosexual rights will supply long term political advantages for the GOP and the conservative move. He argues that an anti-gay schedule succinctly exposes the hypocrisy of these who speak of restricted govt and person rights yet forget about either by way of homosexual rights and different own freedom matters. certainly, it's the defenders of homosexual rights inside of Republican ranks who're conserving religion with center conservative ideas. He additionally offers various polling information that convey that rank-and-file Republicans, together with many Tea get together supporters, are way more supportive of homosexual rights than typically presumed. Lampo’s name to embody homosexual rights is bound to be hotly debated in the conservative circulation.
Read or Download A Fundamental Freedom: Why Republicans, Conservatives, and Libertarians Should Support Gay Rights PDF
Similar civil rights books
Describes landmark loose speech judgements of the preferrred court docket whereas highlighting the problems of language, rhetoric, and verbal exchange that underlie them. on the intersection of conversation and primary modification legislation live major questions: what's the speech we should guard, and why may still we shield it?
Regardless of common admiration for the 1st Amendment's safety of speech, this iconic characteristic of yank felony suggestion hasn't ever been correctly theorized. latest theories of speech continue at the foundation of criminal doctrine and judicial decisionmaking, social and political philosophy, or felony and highbrow background.
This assortment engages with a vital topic on european citizenship - the emancipation of convinced electorate, the alienation of others - and expands the horizons to interrogate even if comparable debates and traits might be pointed out in different fields of ecu integration. the point of interest of the ebook is tremendously citizen-focused.
This publication is an anthology of labor by means of severe media students, media makers, and activists who're dedicated to advancing social justice. subject matters addressed comprise yet are usually not constrained to foreign media activist tasks corresponding to the perfect to conversation stream and its corollaries; the significance of listening and enacting rules that boost democratic media; local and native media justice initiatives; explorations of the demanding situations the period of participatory media pose to public media; early life and minority media tasks and activism; moral dilemmas posed through makes an attempt to democratize entry to media instruments; the ongoing marginalization of feminist views in foreign coverage venues; software program freedom and highbrow estate rights; video activism in either historic and modern contexts; web ideas for protecting dissenting voices; and 5 bills by way of widespread scholar/activists in their lifelong struggles for media justice.
- Maritime Women: Global Leadership (WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs)
- Race, Wrongs, and Remedies: Group Justice in the 21st Century (Hoover Studies in Politics, Economics, and Society)
- Media Independence: Working with Freedom or Working for Free? (Routledge Research in Cultural and Media Studies)
- An Idea Whose Time Has Come: Two Presidents, Two Parties, and the Battle for the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Between Light and Shadow: The World Bank, The International Monetary Fund and International Human Rights Law (Studies in International Law)
- On the Road to Freedom: A Guided Tour of the Civil Rights Trail
Additional info for A Fundamental Freedom: Why Republicans, Conservatives, and Libertarians Should Support Gay Rights
On that day, however, the Obama administration announced a reversal of its previous policy of defending DOMA against lawsuits challenging its constitutionality. 77 Unfortunately, in response to this policy change by the administration, the House Republican leadership, in the form of the so-called Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), stepped in to challenge this new policy by arguing in court filings that DOMA is constitutional and that Congress has the authority to arbitrarily decide what the definition of marriage is regardless of what the states decide, thereby overturning the right of the states to determine their own marriage policies.
103 Written with the assistance of Judge Robert Bork and the Alliance for Marriage, this measure sought, in response to outrage about a recent Massachusetts Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage, to preempt the states’ traditional control over this issue by amending the US Constitution to define marriage as strictly a union between a man and a woman. It also failed in the Senate, receiving only forty-eight votes out of the sixty required to invoke cloture, a motion to cut off debate and go to a vote.
Other critics on the right also spoke out against the Obama administration’s DOMA decision. Not to be outdone in his opposition to all things gay, Family Research Council president Tony Perkins attacked the Obama administration for shirking its legal duties, stating that “marriage as a male-female union has been . . ”94 He was ignorant as well (or at least pretending to be) of the polling that now shows a modest majority in favor of same-sex marriage rights. Many Republicans, perhaps understandably, expressed great surprise and even outrage that the president would refuse to defend the constitutionality of a legally enacted statute, saying such a refusal conflicts with his oath of office.